Follow the money
Who owns the brand, where its political giving goes, what it has actually been penalized for, and how the last three months of press have treated it. Every line carries its source and date.
Personal project — not advice, not any organization’s position. Read this first.
This is a personal project. It was built for one household’s own spending decisions. It has nothing to do with, and does not speak for, any company, board, employer, client, or organization its author is associated with. No organization commissioned, reviewed, funded, or endorsed it, and nothing here should be read as the position of any of them.
It is not advice. Nothing here is investment, financial, legal, or employment advice, and none of it is a recommendation to buy or sell any security. A verdict measures a company against one person’s private spending criteria. It is not an objective rating, a compliance opinion, or a judgment of any company’s merit.
Verify before you rely on it. Findings are assembled automatically from public records and press coverage and can be incomplete, out of date, or simply wrong. Every claim carries its source and date — follow the link and read it yourself before acting on anything here.
Sign in to continue
Sign in with an approved Google account to use this tool.
Brand, product, drink, or restaurant — or the company that owns one.
Your lists
Where this comes from
Sources, checked in this order
How to read it
- Nothing is stored as a fixed verdict. Every lookup runs live, because corporate positions move fast.
- A missing HRC score is not a bad score — most companies stopped submitting after 2024. A company that announced it was leaving is a different matter, and counts against it.
- An executive’s personal donations are not the company’s. Findings say which is which.
- 1792 Exchange rates these companies from the opposite direction to HRC. When the two agree, the read is solid.
- The sources are read neutrally; the standard they are judged against is not neutral. It is set in this tool’s settings and is openly pro-DEI, pro-LGBTQ+ and pro-racial-equity. Change the criteria and the verdicts change with them.